Is there a such thing as “pure art”?
There is a great amount of photography that is conceptual. Conceived of and planned ahead of the camera actually meeting its subject. Similar, perhaps, to a cinematographer – methodically crafting a scene. My work is reflexive, responding to my subject’s words, heart, postures, longings, gestures, silences. Nuances connect me, inspire me. It’s when I feel most present. Andy Warhol stated:
“Pure art exists only on the level of instant response to pure life.”
Ashlee, shāna, ©2005
Buy Me Stuff, shāna, ©2007
Insanity is Contagious, shāna, ©2007
I know that many would argue the validity of his belief. I don’t necessarily agree as much as feel a deep kinship to his process. It certainly has been true for me. I can hardly work another way. Consequently, I couldn’t work as a commercial photographer. I have marveled at others whose art is both mapped out and successful. I’m attempting to do this in a new series, Punch The Bed. Medical scans layered with self-portraiture to become one. So far it’s been awkward and troublesome, yet the compulsion to continue persists.
As usual, I would love to hear your thoughts & ideas in the comments below. While you’re at it, feel free to share the post by using the social media links below as well. Thanks so much!
cheers from
Comments (2)